What is Scientific Management?

Scientific Management

Share This...

Scientific Management

Scientific Management, often referred to as Taylorism after its founder Frederick W. Taylor, is a theory of management that analyzes and synthesizes workflows. Its main objective is to improve economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to the engineering of processes and to management.

Here are the key principles of Scientific Management:

  • Time and Motion Studies: Taylor believed in studying labor tasks to determine the most efficient way to perform them. By breaking down each task into its components and analyzing each step, he aimed to find the “one best way” to do each job.
  • Standardized Work: Once the best methods were identified, tasks were standardized across the workforce to ensure consistent performance and output.
  • Skill Specialization: Taylor advocated for workers to specialize in specific tasks rather than having a generalized role. This would make workers more efficient at their particular tasks.
  • Scientific Selection of Workers: Workers should be selected for a job based on their skills and abilities, and then trained to perform the task according to the established standards.
  • Performance-based Pay: Workers should be paid based on their output – a piece-rate system. This would serve as motivation for workers to be more productive.
  • Managerial Authority: Management should be separated from the labor workforce. It’s management’s job to plan, train, and ensure that tasks are performed according to the established standards, while workers should execute the tasks.

Though Scientific Management brought about significant efficiency improvements and had a profound influence on the development of the modern organization, it has also faced criticisms:

  • Over-simplification of Jobs: The emphasis on task specialization can lead to repetitive and monotonous jobs, which can demotivate workers in the long run.
  • Neglect of Human Needs: By focusing solely on efficiency and economic reasoning, the human needs, social aspects, and well-being of workers can be overlooked.
  • Resistance to Change: Workers might resist the changes brought about by Scientific Management, especially if they feel that their expertise and insights are being ignored.

Today, while pure Scientific Management might be rare, its principles are still incorporated in many modern management practices and production systems, such as lean manufacturing. However, contemporary management also places a much stronger emphasis on human resources management, employee motivation, and collaboration between management and workers.

Example of Scientific Management

Let’s use the example of a car manufacturing assembly line, as it is one of the classic arenas where principles of Scientific Management were applied.

Scenario: Assembling a Car Door

In the early days of car manufacturing, the assembly of a car door might be done by a few workers who would handle the entire process. This could involve fetching the parts, assembling them in no particular order, and checking for any issues. Each worker might have had their way of doing things.

Applying Scientific Management:

  • Time and Motion Studies: Management studies the process of car door assembly to determine every specific task involved, from gathering screws to attaching mirrors. They record how long each task takes and identify any unnecessary movements or steps.
  • Standardized Work: After identifying the most efficient way to assemble the door, a standardized method is established. Every worker on that assembly line now follows this exact method, reducing variability and mistakes.
  • Skill Specialization: Instead of one worker assembling the entire door, workers are trained for specific tasks. One worker might specialize in attaching door handles, another in fitting window glass, and another in installing mirrors.
  • Scientific Selection of Workers: Workers are chosen for tasks based on their aptitude for that particular job. Someone with a steady hand might be chosen for tasks requiring precise alignment, while someone with strength might be chosen for tasks that involve heavy lifting.
  • Performance-based Pay: Workers are paid based on the number of doors they correctly assemble. This incentivizes them to work efficiently and produce more, while still maintaining quality.
  • Managerial Authority: Managers or supervisors are responsible for ensuring workers follow the set procedures, offer training when needed, and handle any issues or deviations from the standard process.

Result: The car door assembly process becomes much faster, more consistent in quality, and more efficient in terms of labor hours and materials used.

Criticism: While the assembly line might see significant improvements in productivity, workers might find their jobs monotonous due to the repetitive nature of their tasks. Over time, this could lead to decreased job satisfaction or even health issues, like repetitive strain injuries.

This example showcases how Scientific Management can transform an industry and drive efficiency improvements. The car manufacturing industry, especially with the influence of pioneers like Henry Ford, integrated many principles of Taylorism into their production processes.

Other Posts You'll Like...

Want to Pass as Fast as Possible?

(and avoid failing sections?)

Watch one of our free "Study Hacks" trainings for a free walkthrough of the SuperfastCPA study methods that have helped so many candidates pass their sections faster and avoid failing scores...