In these videos, we walk through 10 AUD practice questions in each to teach about the ethical and independence rules for auditing an issuer. These questions are from AUD content area 1 on the AICPA CPA exam blueprints: Ethics, Professional Responsibilities, and General Principles.
The best way to use each video is to pause each time we get to a new question in the video, and then make your own attempt at the question before watching us go through it.
Also be sure to watch one of our free webinars on the 6 “key ingredients” to an extremely effective & efficient CPA study process here…
Ethical and Independence Rules for Auditing an Issuer
Auditor independence is a cornerstone of public trust in financial reporting, particularly in audits of issuers (public companies). The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) have established strict ethical requirements and independence rules to ensure the integrity and objectivity of auditors. Let’s outline key aspects of these rules and provide practical guidance for applying them to avoid situations that could compromise compliance or impair independence during an audit of an issuer.
1. Auditor Independence: The Foundation
Auditor independence means that auditors must remain free of conflicts of interest, both in fact and appearance, to perform their duties objectively. Under SEC and PCAOB rules, auditors must:
- Avoid financial, business, and personal relationships with the audit client that could impair objectivity.
- Refrain from performing prohibited non-audit services for the client.
- Maintain independence throughout the engagement and in any additional services provided.
2. Prohibited Non-Audit Services
The SEC and PCAOB restrict auditors from providing certain non-audit services to issuers to prevent conflicts of interest. Key prohibitions include:
- Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation: Auditors cannot design or implement financial systems for an issuer audit client, even with preapproval. These services inherently create a self-review threat.
- Bookkeeping Services: Routine bookkeeping or other accounting services that involve preparing the financial records are prohibited for issuers.
- Legal Advocacy: Serving as an expert witness or providing legal services, such as advocating for the client in litigation or regulatory investigations, is not allowed, as it compromises independence.
Permissible non-audit services, such as tax compliance services, must be preapproved by the issuer’s audit committee to ensure compliance with independence rules.
3. Partner Rotation Rules
To prevent over-familiarity and ensure fresh perspectives, SEC and PCAOB rules require audit partners to rotate periodically:
- The lead audit partner must rotate off the engagement after five consecutive years and observe a five-year cooling-off period before returning.
- The concurring partner (who reviews the audit) and other significant partners must rotate after seven consecutive years with the same cooling-off period.
This rotation ensures that the audit team maintains objectivity over long-term engagements.
4. Cooling-Off Period for Employment
To further safeguard independence, SOX requires a one-year cooling-off period for members of the external audit team before accepting senior financial positions (e.g., CEO, CFO, CAO, or controller) with an issuer audit client. This rule prevents potential conflicts of interest arising from close ties between auditors and management.
5. Integrated Audits
For issuers, auditors are required to perform an integrated audit, which includes:
- Auditing financial statements to ensure they are free of material misstatements.
- Assessing internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) to evaluate the effectiveness of the client’s controls in preventing and detecting errors or fraud.
Auditors must issue separate opinions on these two components, ensuring transparency and reliability for stakeholders.
6. Disclosure Requirements for Audit Committees
Audit committees play a crucial role in ensuring compliance with ethical and independence rules. They must:
- Preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the auditor.
- Evaluate whether the audit committee includes a financial expert, as required under SOX Title IV. If no financial expert is present, the issuer must disclose the reason in its annual report.
7. Penalties for Noncompliance
Violating independence rules can lead to severe penalties under SOX and PCAOB regulations. For example:
- Willful destruction of documents to obstruct an investigation can result in fines, imprisonment for up to 20 years, or both under SOX Title VIII.
- Failing to comply with partner rotation or cooling-off requirements can lead to enforcement actions, reputational damage, and loss of trust.
8. Practical Steps for Compliance
To ensure compliance with SEC and PCAOB rules:
- Educate audit teams on independence requirements and prohibited services.
- Establish preapproval processes for all non-audit services.
- Regularly monitor relationships and services to identify and mitigate potential conflicts of interest.
- Implement a partner rotation tracking system to ensure timely transitions.
- Maintain a clear audit committee charter outlining responsibilities, including preapproval and financial expert evaluations.
