REG CPA Exam: Example Scenarios to Identify the Remedy Available for a Breach of Contract

Example Scenarios to Identify the Remedy Available for a Breach of Contract

Share This...


Purpose of the Article

In this article, we’ll cover example scenarios to identify the remedy available for a breach of contract. The primary purpose of this article is to provide an in-depth understanding of the various remedies available for a breach of contract, particularly tailored for individuals preparing for the REG CPA exam. This article aims to elucidate the theoretical concepts and practical applications of these remedies, enhancing the reader’s ability to accurately identify and apply the appropriate remedy in different scenarios. By presenting detailed example scenarios, this article seeks to bridge the gap between theory and practice, ensuring that readers are well-prepared for both exam questions and real-world situations.

Importance of Understanding Remedies for Breach of Contract in the REG CPA Exam

Understanding the remedies available for a breach of contract is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it forms a significant part of the CPA exam’s Regulation (REG) section, which covers business law, federal taxation, and other regulations affecting professional responsibilities and duties. A solid grasp of contract law and its remedies not only contributes to a higher exam score but also equips candidates with essential knowledge they will use in their professional careers.

Secondly, knowledge of contract remedies ensures that future CPAs can competently advise clients or employers on the potential consequences and legal options available in the event of a contract breach. This competence is essential for maintaining professional integrity and delivering high-quality service.

Brief Overview of the Types of Remedies Available

There are several types of remedies available for a breach of contract, each serving a different purpose and applicable in varying circumstances. The primary remedies include:

  1. Compensatory Damages: These are intended to compensate the non-breaching party for the direct losses and costs incurred due to the breach. The goal is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred.
  2. Consequential Damages: These cover indirect and foreseeable losses resulting from the breach. They go beyond direct costs and address the broader impact of the breach on the non-breaching party.
  3. Punitive Damages: Awarded in rare cases, punitive damages aim to punish the breaching party for particularly egregious conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future.
  4. Nominal Damages: When a breach occurs without significant loss, nominal damages may be awarded as a symbolic acknowledgment of the breach.
  5. Liquidated Damages: These are pre-determined amounts specified in the contract, enforceable if the actual damages are difficult to ascertain, provided they are reasonable and not punitive in nature.
  6. Specific Performance: This remedy requires the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the non-breaching party.
  7. Rescission: Rescission involves canceling the contract and restoring both parties to their pre-contractual positions, effectively undoing the contract.
  8. Restitution: Restitution aims to prevent the breaching party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of the non-breaching party, ensuring that any benefits conferred are returned.

By understanding these remedies, REG CPA exam candidates will be better equipped to identify the appropriate remedy for different breach scenarios, enhancing their exam performance and professional capabilities.

Types of Remedies for Breach of Contract

Compensatory Damages


Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the non-breaching party for the losses directly incurred as a result of the breach of contract. The primary goal is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred. These damages are a fundamental remedy in contract law and serve to cover actual, quantifiable losses.

Calculation Methods

The calculation of compensatory damages involves determining the monetary value of the losses suffered by the non-breaching party. This typically includes:

  • Direct Losses: The difference between the value of the performance promised and the value of the performance received.
  • Incidental Damages: Costs incurred as a direct result of the breach, such as expenses for finding a replacement service or product.
  • Expectation Damages: The expected profit or benefit the non-breaching party would have received if the contract had been performed as agreed.

For instance, if a contractor fails to complete a construction project, compensatory damages would cover the cost to hire a new contractor to finish the work and any additional expenses incurred due to the delay.

Consequential Damages


Consequential damages, also known as special damages, compensate for indirect and foreseeable losses that result from the breach of contract. These damages go beyond the immediate scope of the contract and address the ripple effects of the breach on the non-breaching party’s broader circumstances.


Examples of consequential damages include:

  • Lost Profits: If the breach causes the non-breaching party to lose business opportunities or sales.
  • Damage to Reputation: If the breach negatively impacts the non-breaching party’s standing or relationships in the market.
  • Additional Costs: Expenses that arise as a consequence of the breach, such as storage fees, lost time, or operational disruptions.

For example, if a supplier fails to deliver critical components on time, resulting in a manufacturing shutdown, the manufacturer may claim consequential damages for lost sales and additional costs incurred during the downtime.

Punitive Damages


Punitive damages are awarded in addition to compensatory damages and are intended to punish the breaching party for particularly wrongful conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future. Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages are not aimed at compensating the non-breaching party for actual losses.

Circumstances Under Which They Are Awarded

Punitive damages are awarded in cases where the breaching party’s conduct is found to be willfully malicious, fraudulent, or egregiously negligent. These damages are relatively rare in contract law and are typically reserved for cases that involve a significant moral wrongdoing or intentional misconduct.

For example, if a party deliberately breaches a contract with the intent to cause harm or to deceive the other party, the court may award punitive damages to punish the breaching party and set an example to deter similar actions in the future.

Nominal Damages


Nominal damages are a small, symbolic sum awarded when a breach of contract has occurred, but the non-breaching party has not suffered any significant financial loss as a result. The purpose of nominal damages is to acknowledge that a legal wrong has occurred, even if there are no substantial losses to compensate.


Examples of situations where nominal damages might be awarded include:

  • Technical Breach: Where a breach occurs, but the non-breaching party has already mitigated any potential losses.
  • Principle of the Matter: When the non-breaching party pursues legal action to establish that a breach occurred, even without significant financial harm.

For instance, if a seller fails to deliver goods by the specified date but the buyer incurs no loss because they did not need the goods immediately, the court may award nominal damages to acknowledge the breach.

By understanding these types of damages, REG CPA exam candidates can effectively analyze and determine the appropriate remedy for various breach of contract scenarios, which is essential for both exam success and practical application in their professional careers.

Liquidated Damages


Liquidated damages are pre-determined amounts specified within a contract, agreed upon by both parties at the time of contract formation. These amounts are intended to represent a fair estimation of the potential losses that may occur in the event of a breach. Liquidated damages provide a clear and predictable remedy, avoiding the need for complex calculations or litigation to determine actual damages.

Enforceability Criteria

For liquidated damages to be enforceable, they must meet certain criteria:

  1. Reasonableness: The amount must be a reasonable estimate of the anticipated loss at the time the contract was formed. It should not be punitive or excessively disproportionate to the potential harm.
  2. Difficulty in Estimating Actual Damages: The actual damages resulting from a breach must be difficult to accurately estimate. Liquidated damages are intended to simplify compensation in cases where quantifying losses is challenging.
  3. Intent to Compensate, Not Punish: The liquidated damages clause must aim to compensate for losses, not to penalize the breaching party.

For example, in a construction contract, liquidated damages might be specified for each day the project completion is delayed beyond the agreed deadline, reflecting the anticipated loss of revenue or additional costs incurred.

Specific Performance


Specific performance is a legal remedy that requires the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations as originally agreed. This remedy is typically sought when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the non-breaching party, often due to the unique nature of the subject matter involved.

Situations Where It Is Applicable

Specific performance is most commonly applicable in cases involving:

  • Unique Goods: Contracts for rare, unique, or irreplaceable items, such as real estate, antiques, or custom-made goods.
  • Personal Services: Situations where the service provided is unique and cannot be easily substituted, though courts are generally reluctant to enforce specific performance for personal services due to issues of practicality and personal liberty.

For instance, if a seller breaches a contract to sell a unique piece of real estate, the buyer may seek specific performance to compel the seller to transfer the property, as monetary compensation would not be sufficient to acquire an equivalent property.



Rescission is a remedy that involves canceling the contract and restoring both parties to their pre-contractual positions. This means that any benefits conferred under the contract are returned, effectively undoing the agreement as if it never existed.

When It Can Be Sought

Rescission can be sought in various circumstances, including:

  • Mutual Mistake: When both parties are mistaken about a fundamental fact that affects the contract.
  • Fraud or Misrepresentation: If one party has been induced to enter the contract based on fraudulent statements or misrepresentations by the other party.
  • Duress or Undue Influence: When one party was forced or unduly influenced to enter the contract against their free will.
  • Breach of Contract: In cases of a significant breach that defeats the purpose of the contract.

For example, if a party was induced to sign a contract based on fraudulent information, they could seek rescission to nullify the contract and recover any consideration they provided.



Restitution is a remedy designed to prevent unjust enrichment by requiring the breaching party to return any benefits they have received from the non-breaching party. The goal is to restore the non-breaching party to the position they were in before the contract was formed.

Examples of Application

Restitution is applicable in various scenarios, such as:

  • Contract Rescission: Following the rescission of a contract due to fraud or misrepresentation, the parties must return any benefits received.
  • Quantum Meruit: When one party provides services or goods under a contract that is later found to be unenforceable, they may seek restitution for the value of the services or goods provided.

For instance, if a service provider begins work under a contract that is subsequently rescinded due to the client’s misrepresentation, the provider can claim restitution for the value of the work performed up to the point of rescission.

Understanding these types of remedies and their specific applications will help REG CPA exam candidates accurately identify the appropriate remedy for various breach of contract scenarios, ensuring a comprehensive grasp of contract law principles essential for both the exam and professional practice.

Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Compensatory Damages

Background of the Contract and Breach

Company A enters into a contract with Company B to purchase 500 custom-manufactured parts for a new product line at a total cost of $50,000. Company B fails to deliver the parts by the agreed-upon deadline, causing Company A to halt production and lose significant sales revenue. Company A must quickly source the parts from another supplier at a higher cost.

Calculation of Compensatory Damages

To calculate compensatory damages, Company A would consider:

  • Direct Losses: The additional cost incurred to source the parts from an alternative supplier. If the new supplier charges $60,000 for the parts, the direct loss is $10,000.
  • Incidental Damages: Any extra costs related to the breach, such as expedited shipping fees or overtime wages paid to workers to make up for lost production time. Suppose these costs amount to $5,000.
  • Expectation Damages: The lost profits from the delayed product launch. If Company A anticipated $20,000 in profits during the delay period, this amount would also be included.

Total compensatory damages would be the sum of direct losses, incidental damages, and expectation damages: $10,000 + $5,000 + $20,000 = $35,000.

Scenario 2: Consequential Damages

Background of the Contract and Breach

Restaurant X signs a contract with Supplier Y to provide a unique ingredient essential for their signature dish. Supplier Y fails to deliver the ingredient on time, causing Restaurant X to remove the dish from the menu for a week. As a result, Restaurant X loses customers and suffers a decline in overall sales.

Assessment of Consequential Damages

To assess consequential damages, Restaurant X would consider:

  • Lost Profits: The profit loss from customers who either did not visit the restaurant or chose not to purchase alternative dishes. Suppose Restaurant X usually makes a profit of $2,000 per week from the signature dish, and the overall decline in sales due to customer dissatisfaction amounts to an additional $3,000.
  • Damage to Reputation: The long-term impact on customer loyalty and restaurant reputation, although harder to quantify, could be argued in court if there is evidence of a significant negative impact.

The total consequential damages claimed would be $2,000 + $3,000 = $5,000. The court might also consider evidence regarding reputational damage to determine additional compensation.

Scenario 3: Punitive Damages

Background of the Contract and Breach

Company C contracts with Vendor D for the supply of environmentally friendly packaging materials. Vendor D, aware of the contract terms, deliberately delivers non-compliant, cheaper packaging materials to save costs, hoping Company C will not notice. Company C discovers the fraud and incurs costs to replace the materials and to manage customer complaints.

Justification for Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are considered due to Vendor D’s intentional and fraudulent conduct. The court would evaluate:

  • Malicious Intent: Vendor D knowingly breached the contract with fraudulent intent.
  • Egregious Conduct: The deliberate action to deceive and provide substandard goods.

In this scenario, the court might award punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages to punish Vendor D and deter similar future conduct. For instance, if compensatory damages are calculated at $30,000, the court could decide on a punitive damages amount that is sufficient to act as a deterrent, such as $50,000.

Scenario 4: Nominal Damages

Background of the Contract and Breach

Freelancer E contracts with Client F to deliver a series of marketing materials by a specific date for $5,000. Freelancer E completes and delivers the work one day late. Client F had a flexible timeline and did not suffer any financial loss or operational disruption due to the delay.

Explanation of Nominal Damages Awarded

In this scenario, while a breach of contract occurred (the delay in delivery), Client F did not incur any significant losses. The court may award nominal damages to acknowledge the breach and uphold the principle that a contract was violated.

Nominal damages might be a token amount, such as $1 or $10, symbolically affirming that Freelancer E breached the contract but did not cause material harm to Client F. This serves to recognize the breach without providing undue compensation for nonexistent losses.

These example scenarios help illustrate the application of various remedies for breach of contract, aiding REG CPA exam candidates in understanding how to identify and calculate appropriate remedies in different situations.

Scenario 5: Liquidated Damages

Background of the Contract and Breach

Developer G contracts with Contractor H to complete the construction of a commercial building by a specific deadline. The contract includes a liquidated damages clause stating that Contractor H will pay $1,000 for each day the project is delayed beyond the agreed completion date. Contractor H fails to complete the project on time, causing a 15-day delay.

Evaluation of Liquidated Damages Clause

To evaluate the enforceability of the liquidated damages clause, the following criteria must be considered:

  • Reasonableness: The $1,000 per day amount must be a reasonable estimate of the anticipated losses Developer G would suffer due to the delay. If Developer G can demonstrate that the delay resulted in lost rental income or other financial impacts approximating this amount, the clause is likely reasonable.
  • Difficulty in Estimating Actual Damages: The clause is more likely to be enforceable if actual damages from the delay would be difficult to precisely quantify.
  • Intent to Compensate, Not Punish: The clause must aim to compensate Developer G for genuine anticipated losses rather than to punish Contractor H.

In this case, assuming the $1,000 per day is a fair reflection of the expected losses, the liquidated damages for the 15-day delay would total $15,000.

Scenario 6: Specific Performance

Background of the Contract and Breach

Art Collector I enters into a contract with Artist J to purchase a unique, commissioned painting. Artist J receives payment but fails to deliver the painting as agreed. The painting is a one-of-a-kind work with special significance to Art Collector I, who cannot obtain a similar piece elsewhere.

Argument for Specific Performance

Specific performance is argued on the grounds that:

  • Unique Goods: The painting is unique and irreplaceable, making monetary compensation inadequate.
  • Inadequate Legal Remedy: No amount of money can substitute for the unique value and personal significance of the painting to Art Collector I.

In this scenario, the court may order Artist J to complete and deliver the painting as per the contract terms, as this is the only way to fully satisfy Art Collector I’s expectations and contractual rights.

Scenario 7: Rescission

Background of the Contract and Breach

Buyer K signs a contract to purchase a car from Seller L, who falsely represents the car as having a clean accident history. After the purchase, Buyer K discovers that the car has been in multiple accidents and its value is significantly less than what was paid.

Process and Effects of Rescission

Rescission involves canceling the contract and returning both parties to their pre-contractual positions:

  • Mutual Restoration: Buyer K returns the car to Seller L, and Seller L refunds the purchase price to Buyer K.
  • Void Contract: The contract is treated as if it never existed, nullifying any obligations or benefits conferred.

In this scenario, Buyer K seeks rescission based on Seller L’s fraudulent misrepresentation. The court grants rescission, requiring the car to be returned and the purchase price refunded, thereby undoing the contract and restoring Buyer K to their original position before the fraudulent transaction.

Scenario 8: Restitution

Background of the Contract and Breach

Service Provider M contracts with Client N to develop a custom software application. Client N pays an upfront fee for the development work. Partway through the project, Client N breaches the contract by refusing to provide necessary information and access, making it impossible for Service Provider M to complete the work.

Calculation and Application of Restitution

Restitution aims to prevent unjust enrichment by ensuring that Service Provider M is compensated for the work already performed:

  • Value of Services Rendered: Service Provider M calculates the value of the completed work up to the point of breach. If Service Provider M has completed 50% of the project and the total contract value was $20,000, the value of the services rendered would be $10,000.
  • Return of Benefits: Client N must return any benefits received from the partial completion of the project. If Client N has used the developed portions of the software, this usage is taken into account in calculating restitution.

In this case, Service Provider M is entitled to $10,000 in restitution, representing the value of the work completed before the breach, ensuring that Client N does not unjustly benefit from the partial services without fair compensation.

By examining these scenarios, REG CPA exam candidates can gain a practical understanding of how different remedies for breach of contract are applied, enhancing their ability to analyze and respond to similar situations in both the exam and their professional practice.

Factors Influencing the Choice of Remedy

Severity of the Breach

The severity of the breach is a crucial factor in determining the appropriate remedy. Breaches can range from minor violations of contract terms to significant failures that undermine the entire purpose of the agreement. Courts will assess the extent of the breach to decide whether compensatory damages are sufficient or if more severe remedies, such as rescission or specific performance, are warranted. For example, a minor delay in delivery might result in nominal damages, while a complete failure to deliver a unique product might justify specific performance.

Nature of the Contract

The type of contract and the subject matter involved play a significant role in remedy selection. Contracts involving unique goods, personal services, or intellectual property may necessitate specific remedies due to the irreplaceable nature of the subject matter. For instance, in contracts for the sale of unique artworks or custom-built machinery, specific performance might be the preferred remedy because monetary damages cannot adequately compensate for the loss of the unique item.

Impact on the Non-Breaching Party

The impact of the breach on the non-breaching party’s position and interests is a key consideration. Courts will examine how the breach has affected the non-breaching party’s business operations, financial stability, and future prospects. If the breach has caused substantial economic loss, consequential damages might be appropriate. Conversely, if the non-breaching party has suffered little to no harm, nominal damages may be awarded to acknowledge the breach without significant compensation.

Availability of Alternative Remedies

The availability and adequacy of alternative remedies also influence the choice of remedy. If monetary damages can fully compensate the non-breaching party, courts are less likely to order specific performance or rescission. However, when alternative remedies are insufficient, such as when the subject matter is unique or damages are difficult to quantify, courts may opt for more tailored solutions like specific performance or equitable relief.

Legal and Contractual Limitations

Legal principles and contractual provisions can impose limitations on the remedies available. For instance:

  • Liquidated Damages Clauses: Contracts may include liquidated damages clauses that specify the amount to be paid in case of breach. These clauses are enforceable if they are reasonable estimates of anticipated losses and not punitive.
  • Exculpatory Clauses: Some contracts contain clauses that limit or exclude certain types of damages. Courts will enforce these clauses if they are clear and not unconscionable.
  • Statutory Limits: Legal statutes may impose caps on certain types of damages, such as punitive damages or compensation for specific types of breaches.

Understanding these factors and their interplay helps in accurately determining the most appropriate remedy for breach of contract situations. This knowledge is essential for REG CPA exam candidates to effectively analyze and apply contract law principles in both exam scenarios and real-world practice.


Recap of Key Points

In this article, we explored the various remedies available for a breach of contract, including compensatory damages, consequential damages, punitive damages, nominal damages, liquidated damages, specific performance, rescission, and restitution. Each remedy serves a unique purpose and is applicable under specific circumstances. We also examined real-world scenarios to illustrate how these remedies are applied and discussed factors influencing the choice of remedy, such as the severity of the breach, the nature of the contract, the impact on the non-breaching party, the availability of alternative remedies, and legal and contractual limitations.

Importance of Understanding the Appropriate Remedy for Different Breach Scenarios

Understanding the appropriate remedy for different breach scenarios is crucial for several reasons. First, it ensures that the non-breaching party receives fair compensation or equitable relief, aligning with the principle of justice. Second, it helps legal professionals and business practitioners make informed decisions, mitigating potential losses and resolving disputes effectively. For CPA exam candidates, a thorough grasp of these remedies is essential for answering exam questions accurately and demonstrating a solid understanding of contract law principles.

Tips for the REG CPA Exam Preparation

  1. Familiarize Yourself with Key Concepts: Ensure you have a strong grasp of the different types of remedies for breach of contract and the scenarios in which each is applicable. Use study guides, textbooks, and online resources to reinforce your understanding.
  2. Practice with Real-World Scenarios: Work through practice questions and case studies that involve breach of contract scenarios. This will help you apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations, a skill often tested in the REG CPA exam.
  3. Understand Legal and Contractual Limitations: Pay close attention to clauses in contracts, such as liquidated damages and exculpatory clauses, and understand how they can influence the choice of remedy. Be aware of statutory limits on damages as well.
  4. Review Court Cases: Studying landmark court cases related to breach of contract and the remedies awarded can provide valuable insights into how courts determine the appropriate remedy.
  5. Use Mnemonics and Summaries: Create mnemonics and summary notes to remember key points about each type of remedy. These can be useful for quick revision before the exam.
  6. Time Management: Practice answering questions within a set time limit to improve your ability to manage time effectively during the exam. This will help you allocate sufficient time to each section and complete the exam efficiently.

By following these tips and thoroughly understanding the remedies for breach of contract, you will be well-prepared for the REG CPA exam and equipped to handle real-world contract disputes effectively in your professional career.

Other Posts You'll Like...

Want to Pass as Fast as Possible?

(and avoid failing sections?)

Watch one of our free "Study Hacks" trainings for a free walkthrough of the SuperfastCPA study methods that have helped so many candidates pass their sections faster and avoid failing scores...